August 20, 2014, 08:37:12 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email
News: Arturia's webmaster is glad to offer you these brand new forums ! Have fun using it and feel free to email any encountered problem at webmaster@arturia.com.

Arturia Forums



Author Topic: A voting poll for MMV enhancements  (Read 26717 times)

dzy88p

  • Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Karma: 0
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2004, 03:24:48 pm »
Thanks Xavier!  Good luck!

ckmurf

  • Guest
re: A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2004, 05:16:59 pm »
I vote for (in order):
1) One screen synthesizer
2) Ring modulator
3) External audio input
4) Sample and hold
Please add that to the statistics however you see fit.

just another guest

  • Guest
how does it work?
« Reply #17 on: April 24, 2004, 03:23:31 pm »
Hi,

I see many votes for ringmodulator here, but only one that counts.

???

Ciao, Daniel

Anonymous

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2004, 10:16:07 pm »
I would like a way of patching up and previewing in my sequencer at a rate of 22k or 32k then when Ive got something funky I can then set the rate to 44.1k or 48k, then freeze the track.

Also a simple line representing a cable would do, the fancy cables seem to use up a lot of memory.

soundbutcher

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2004, 11:44:51 am »
I think it's absolutely essential that common parameters like cutoff frequency and resonance be accessible from Sonar and/or Cubase for automated filter sweeps.

It would be even better if we could assign a midi controller number to every knob you can twist.

Anonymous

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2004, 12:52:33 pm »
soundbutcher, Its already possible via the learn function. It's all in the manual :!:

soundbutcher

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2004, 02:08:18 pm »
@Guest: I'm already aware that you can do a bit of automation with the controller wheel, but I think that's not what you meant. What exactly is "already possible via the learn function" -- to assign arbitrary controller numbers to arbitrary knobs?

This was obviously not mentioned in the quickstart PDF. If it's true, I might even buy the full version even if Arturia don't follow interface design conventions :wink:

dber

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2004, 09:17:26 pm »
I would like to be able to pick and choose which modules I want in my system, which is a big part of modular synthesis.  Also, I think arturia should include a list of all Moog modules to choose from, including the rare ones the frequency shifter and the string filter.  Also, I think they should include new ones that they think will add more to the system, like the LFO's they have on the modular V.  I think this would give the user a much better taste of modular synthesis.

SynthBaron

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #23 on: July 27, 2004, 04:41:41 pm »
Voltage-Control over the individual envelope sections...

Cold Steel

  • Guest
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2004, 12:27:51 pm »
I vote for simply for the unglamorous bug fixes that needed to turn the MMV into a truly usable product.

Please see my recent post in the thread called "A bug in MMV?".  If you haven't encountered those bugs then you probably haven't really exercised the product and stick to relatively simple setups.

But thanks Arturia for having the desire to at least improve the features given!

Cold Steel

Rob:-)

  • Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: 0
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2006, 09:51:09 pm »
I thought the ModularVís sound was updated like the Mini for V2.0?  :?

To make a top synth even better Iíd have mod input for VCA panning, exponential curves for the XY joystick, mod input for envelope parameters, more assignable MIDI cc# for sequencer functions (namely step on/off) and improved high frequency filter modulation like the TimewARP if poss please! :D
Have a good time all the time. ;-)

max cooper

  • Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Karma: 0
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #26 on: June 27, 2006, 03:19:02 pm »
I absolutely love the MM.

I would like to be able to scroll up and down with the scroll wheel on my mouse.

Is that what the scrolling option on the poll entails?

Thanks
Max

avessur

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: 0
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #27 on: July 03, 2006, 02:26:14 pm »
would like to see a little bit more flexibility with the modules. More than two lfos at a time, say like 4 or 6. the same for the formant module, possible to use it in only one instance.

KennethA

  • Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 0
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2006, 02:38:33 pm »
Quote from: "xavier"

I can say more than 1 month, less than 1 year :wink:
Xavier


HA HA !!

Nice time estimate Xavier !

Au revoir !

KennethA

BobTheDog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 93
  • Karma: 2
A voting poll for MMV enhancements
« Reply #29 on: July 02, 2007, 08:51:18 pm »
How about just using less than 100% cpu per instance on a MacPro, thats what I would go for.

 

Carbonate design by Bloc
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines